Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Publishers
Posted

1 min read

Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)

Artist concept showing various projects the SWS team works on, from developing new data solutions, new technology and the safety risks associated with it, from robotics to unmanned aircraft and more.

System-Wide Safety (SWS) project leaders are listed here.

Project Manager
Dr. Kyle Ellis

Deputy Project Manager
Summer Brandt

Associate Project Manager
Dr. Wendy Okolo

Associate Project Manager
Michael Vincent

Project Scientist
Dr. Paul Miner

Senior Technical Advisor for Aviation Safety
Dr. Lance Prinzel

Senior Technical Advisor for Autonomy
Dr. Joseph Coughlan

Senior Technical Advisor for Assurance
Dr. Natasha Neogi

Safety Liaison
Dr. Misty Davies

Back to main System-Wide Safety project page.

Keep Exploring

Discover More Topics From NASA

Share

Details

Last Updated
Jul 31, 2024
Editor
Jim Banke
Contact

Related Terms

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By NASA
      1 min read
      Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)
      The Airspace Operations and Safety Program (AOSP) enables safe, sustainable, and efficient aviation transportation operations to benefit the flying public and ensure the global competitiveness of the U.S. aviation industry. We are transforming the future of aviation into a digital, federated, and service-oriented architecture that fosters the growth of safe airspace for all users.
      By partnering with FAA, academia, safety experts, operators, manufacturers, municipalities, and other government agencies, we facilitate the integration of new aviation technologies, ensure airspace access for new entrants, and champion the success of increasingly autonomous operations. At AOSP, safety is at the heart of everything we do. We stand firm in our unwavering commitment to the safe integration of these vehicles.
       AOSP Approach:
      Efficient, Sustainable Aviation Operations Seamless Integration of Heterogeneous and Emergent Aviation Prognostic In-Time Aviation Safety Management System of Future Operations System Level Autonomy for Aviation Operations, Vehicle Command and Control Systems, and Safety Meet the diversity, density, and complexity challenges of future aviation AOSP Projects
      Advanced Capabilities for Emergency Response Operations Project
      Air Mobility Pathfinders
      Air Traffic Management—Exploration (ATM-X)
      System-Wide Safety (SWS)
      Facebook logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es @NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es Instagram logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es Linkedin logo @NASA Explore More
      2 min read Media Invited to Speak to NASA Ames Experts – Celebrating 85 Years
      Article 2 hours ago 3 min read NASA Sees Progress on Starlab Commercial Space Station Development
      Article 24 hours ago 4 min read Helium Conservation by Diffusion Limited Purging of Liquid Hydrogen Tanks
      Article 5 days ago Keep Exploring Discover More Topics From NASA
      Missions
      Humans In Space
      Solar System Exploration
      Solar System Overview Our solar system has one star, eight planets, five officially named dwarf planets, hundreds of moons, thousands…
      Explore NASA’s History
      Share
      Details
      Last Updated Dec 17, 2024 EditorLillian GipsonContactJim Bankejim.banke@nasa.gov Related Terms
      General View the full article
    • By NASA
      This article is from the 2024 Technical Update.

      Multiple human spaceflight programs are underway at NASA including Orion, Space Launch System, Gateway, Human Landing System, and EVA and Lunar Surface Mobility programs. Achieving success in these programs requires NASA to collaborate with a variety of commercial partners, including both new spaceflight companies and robotic spaceflight companies pursuing crewed spaceflight for the first time. It is not always clear to these organizations how to show their systems are safe for human spaceflight. This is particularly true for avionics systems, which are responsible for performing some of a crewed spacecraft’s most critical functions. NASA recently published guidance describing how to show the design of an avionic system meets safety requirements for crewed missions.
      Background
      The avionics in a crewed spacecraft perform many safety critical functions, including controlling the position and attitude of the spacecraft, activating onboard abort systems, and firing pyrotechnics. The incorrect operation of any of these functions can be catastrophic, causing loss of the crew. NASA’s human rating requirements describe the need for “additional rigor and scrutiny” when designing safety-critical systems beyond that done
      for uncrewed spacecraft [2]. Unfortunately, it is not always clear how to interpret this guidance and show an avionics architecture is sufficiently safe. To address this problem, NASA recently published NASA/TM−20240009366 [1]. It outlines best practices for designing safety-critical avionics, as well as describes key artifacts or evidence NASA needs to assess the safety of an avionics architecture.
      Failure Hypothesis
      One of the most important steps to designing an avionics architecture for crewed spacecraft is specification of the failure hypothesis (FH). In short, the FH summarizes any assumptions the designers make about the type, number, and persistence of component failures (e.g., of onboard computers, network switches). It divides the space of all possible failures into two parts – failures the system is designed to tolerate and failures it is not.
      One key part of the FH is a description of failure modes the system can tolerate – i.e., the behavior exhibited by a failed component. Failure modes are categorized using a failure model. A typical failure model for avionics splits failures into two broad categories:
      Value failures, where data produced by a component is missing (i.e., an omissive failure) or incorrect (i.e., a transmissive failure). Timing failures, where data is produced by a component at the wrong time.
      Timing failures can be further divided into many sub-categories, including:
      Inadvertent activation, where data is produced by a component without the necessary preconditions. Out-of-order failures, where data is produced by a component in an incorrect sequence. Marginal timing failures, where data is produced by a component slightly too early or late.
      In addition to occurring when data is produced by a component, these failure modes can also occur when data enters a component. (e.g., a faulty component can corrupt a message it receives). Moreover, all failure modes can manifest in one of two ways:
      Symmetrically, where all observers see the same faulty behavior. Asymmetrically, where some observers see different faulty behavior.
      Importantly, NASA’s human-rating process requires that each of these failure modes be mitigated if it can result in catastrophic effects [2]. Any exceptions must be explicitly documented and strongly justified. In addition to specifying the failure modes a system can tolerate, the FH must specify any limiting assumptions about the relative arrival times of permanent failures and radiation-induced upsets/ errors or the ability for ground operator to intervene to safe the system or take recovery actions. For more information on specifying a FH and other artifacts needed to evaluate the safety of an avionics architecture for human spaceflight, see the full report [1].
      View the full article
    • By NASA
      The Fresh Eyes on Ice team receives the C. Peter Magrath exemplary project award from the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. H. Buurman Congratulations to the Fresh Eyes on Ice project, which received a C. Peter Magrath exemplary project award from the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities! The award recognizes programs that demonstrate how colleges and universities have redesigned their learning, discovery, and engagement missions to deepen their partnerships and achieve broader impacts in their communities.
      “Thank you to all of you for making this project what it is.” said Fresh Eyes on Ice project lead Research Professor Katie Spellman from the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. “We couldn’t do it without you.”
      Fresh Eyes on Ice tracks changes in the timing and thickness of ice throughout Alaska and the circumpolar north. You can get involved by downloading the GLOBE Observer app and taking photos of ice conditions using the GLOBE Land Cover protocol.
      Fresh Eyes on Ice is supported by the Navigating the New Arctic Program of the U.S. National Science Foundation and the NASA Citizen Science for Earth Systems Program.
      Facebook logo @DoNASAScience @DoNASAScience Share








      Details
      Last Updated Dec 05, 2024 Related Terms
      Citizen Science Earth Science Explore More
      4 min read 2024 AGU Fall Meeting Hyperwall Schedule


      Article


      1 day ago
      2 min read This Thanksgiving, We’re Grateful for NASA’s Volunteer Scientists!


      Article


      1 week ago
      9 min read The Earth Observer Editor’s Corner: Fall 2024


      Article


      3 weeks ago
      View the full article
    • By NASA
      NASA Artemis Campaign Leadership News Conference
    • By NASA
      A waxing gibbous moon rises over the blue glow of Earth’s horizon as the International Space Station orbited 264 miles above the Indian Ocean on Nov. 13, 2024.Credit: NASA NASA Administrator Bill Nelson and leadership will hold a news conference at 1 p.m. EST, Thursday, Dec. 5, at the agency’s headquarters in Washington to provide a briefing about the agency’s Artemis campaign.
      Watch the media event on NASA+. Learn how to stream NASA content through a variety of platforms, including social media.
      Participants include:
      NASA Administrator Bill Nelson NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy NASA Associate Administrator Jim Free Catherine Koerner, associate administrator, Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters Amit Kshatriya, deputy associate administrator, Moon to Mars Program Office, Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate Reid Wiseman, NASA astronaut and Artemis II commander Media interested in participating in-person or by phone must RSVP by 11 a.m. on Dec. 5 to: hq-media@mail.nasa.gov. The news conference will take place in the James E. Webb Auditorium at NASA Headquarters in the Mary W. Jackson building, 300 E St. SW, Washington. A copy of NASA’s media accreditation policy is online.
      Through the Artemis campaign, the agency will establish a long-term presence at the Moon for scientific exploration with our commercial and international partners, learn how to live and work away from home, and prepare for future human exploration of Mars. NASA’s SLS (Space Launch System) rocket, exploration ground systems, and Orion spacecraft, along with the human landing systems, next-generation spacesuits, Gateway lunar space station, and future rovers are NASA’s foundation for deep space exploration.
      For more information about Artemis, visit:
      https://www.nasa.gov/artemis
      -end-
      Meira Bernstein / Rachel Kraft
      Headquarters, Washington
      202-358-1600
      meira.b.bernstein@nasa.gov / rachel.h.kraft@nasa.gov
      Share
      Details
      Last Updated Dec 04, 2024 LocationNASA Headquarters Related Terms
      Missions Artemis Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters View the full article
  • Check out these Videos

×
×
  • Create New...