A Tale of Three Gas Clouds Orbiting the Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of the Milky-Way…
-
Similar Topics
-
By CosmicSignals
I recently came across a fascinating YouTube video titled 'UFO files: ‘Black triangles’ a highlight of latest release.' This video dives into some of the most compelling black triangle sightings documented in official files, and it reminds me of the infamous Phoenix Lights incident back in 1997, which also left many witnesses baffled by the sight of a massive, triangular craft silently gliding through the night sky. The black triangle phenomenon has been a topic of intrigue not only for UFO enthusiasts but also for those interested in the technological capabilities of potential extraterrestrial civilizations.
The video reviews several recent disclosures, particularly emphasizing military encounters with these mysterious black triangles. The accounts of pilots describing their encounters with these crafts are particularly striking. They often report high-speed maneuvers and capabilities far beyond our known aviation technology. What stands out in this video is the presentation of radar data that seems to corroborate these eyewitness reports. Such data is crucial in validating the existence of these phenomena and could provide evidence of advanced technology not yet publicly understood, igniting discussions about what kind of civilization could potentially operate such vehicles.
One claim that piqued my interest was the reference to the craft's silent operation, which has been a consistent detail in many of these sightings. The ability to move without producing sound poses intriguing questions about the propulsion systems that might be in use. This leads to a larger question of whether these technologies could be a product of extraterrestrial engineering or simply advanced human technology that is still classified. The video encourages viewers to consider the implications of these technologies on our understanding of physics and the potential for interstellar travel.
As someone deeply interested in SETI and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, I find it crucial to explore the scientific possibilities that these sightings represent. If we are indeed witnessing advanced craft, what might this imply about the existence of other life forms in the universe? Could we be on the brink of understanding not just the technology behind these crafts, but also the civilizations that created them? The video leaves us pondering if we are approaching a pivotal moment in our search for biosignatures and technosignatures in the cosmos, and whether these sightings could be a precursor to more profound revelations.
I'm curious to hear what everyone thinks about the implications of these recent disclosures. How do you interpret the black triangle sightings in the context of our ongoing search for extraterrestrial life? Do you believe these encounters suggest we are not alone in the universe? Let’s discuss the potential scientific breakthroughs and the mysteries that remain unsolved as we examine the evidence presented in the video.
-
By SpaceObserver
The latest findings from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope have revealed three new exoplanets in the habitable zone of their stars. Each of these planets shows unique characteristics that could suggest they host conditions suitable for life. It's remarkable that we keep finding these worlds that might have what it takes to support life as we know it, or even life as we don't yet understand.
One of the most intriguing aspects of these new discoveries is the diversity in their atmospheres. The data indicate one planet has a significant amount of water vapor in its atmosphere, which raises interesting questions about its potential for supporting life. Water is often considered a critical ingredient for life, so discovering it in the right conditions is a huge step.
Another planet in the mix is slightly larger than Earth but is located at just the right distance from its star to allow liquid water on its surface. This specific orbital position is always a point of interest in the search for extraterrestrial life. I wonder how soon we might be able to learn more about these worlds’ atmospheres and compositions.
We've had a few close looks at exoplanets in the past few years, especially since the launch of the JWST. Each new discovery seems to push our understanding of where and how life could exist. While we can theorize about these habitable worlds, real evidence will only come from future missions that can analyze their atmospheres or even send probes if the technology advances.
Given the rapid pace of discoveries in this field, do you think we might find signs of extraterrestrial life in the next decade? Or are we still in the early stages of this journey? It feels like every couple of months we’re getting new information that shakes up our expectations about life beyond Earth.
The implications of these discoveries stretch far beyond just the scientific community. If we do confirm life on another planet, it could fundamentally change how we view our place in the universe. Until we get to that point, I’m curious about what everyone thinks about these latest discoveries and what they might mean for the future of astrobiology.
-
By DisclosureWatch
I've been following the recent discussions about the potential for life in the clouds of Venus, especially after the detection of phosphine gas back in 2020. The idea that such a harsh environment could support some form of microbial life is fascinating, and it raises so many questions about astrobiology and what we consider habitable environments. Given the extreme temperatures and pressures, it makes you wonder how life could adapt or even thrive there.
More recently, some scientists have suggested that these findings might not be just anomalies but could indicate actual biological processes at work. If Venus can support some sort of life form, what does that mean for our understanding of life in the universe? Are we looking at a new frontier in astrobiology? The implications for future missions to Venus seem significant.
I read a report discussing the upcoming missions that might focus on analyzing the atmosphere more closely. These missions could provide crucial data regarding the composition of the clouds and any potential biosignatures. I'm curious about how these findings could change our approach to searching for life on other planets. Will future Venus missions incorporate advanced techniques to look for specific biosignatures?
Additionally, I wonder how the scientific community and the public would react if clear evidence of life forms in the Venusian clouds were to emerge. It seems we're at a tipping point in our understanding of what constitutes a habitable environment. Are we ready to redefine our criteria for life?
What do you all think about the current research on Venus? Do you believe we could eventually confirm the existence of life there, even if it's just microbial? And how do you think this will influence our search for life on exoplanets in the future? Let’s discuss!
-
By Avi Loeb Medium
(Image credit: Greg Wyatt)Life on Earth started with the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA), dated to 4.2 billion years ago (as deduced here). Humanity’s first artificial satellite was Sputnik, launched away from Earth’s surface on October 4, 1957. It is commonly assumed that this was the first technological satellite around Earth.
However, suppose intelligent life emerged when Earth was 94% of its current age (which is 4.54 billion years), namely 272 million years ago. In that case, a technological civilization could have started launching satellites a few million years after their intelligence emerged — similarly to humanity’s case. About 252 million years ago, this 20-million-years-old civilization could have polluted the Earth’s atmosphere with greenhouse gases, enough to trigger the largest extinction in Earth’s history, ending the Permian period by killing 96% of marine species in a global warming event that left ocean animals unable to breathe. This well-known “great dying” event in Earth’s history is often interpreted as the natural consequence of the release of greenhouse gases by volcanic eruptions (as reported here). But what if this global catastrophe was technologically-driven instead? Would we have notice any “smoking gun” left in the crime scene?
(Image credit: Greg Wyatt)Over the past 252 million years, surface layers of Earth have continuously mixed with the interior, primarily through plate tectonics. Subduction zones drag surface crust, water, and sediments into the mantle, while mantle plumes and volcanic activity bring interior materials to the surface. This mixing could have destroyed or buried any technological relics on Earth’s surface from that time. However, sufficiently advanced technological orbiters could have survived. Such `pre-historic’ satellites would be flagged as Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) by the U.S. military and intelligence agencies. The imminent release of UFO files by the White House might provide archaeological evidence for a pre-human intelligence on Earth.
A more speculative idea is that humanity will develop a time machine in the future. In that case, UFOs might simply represent visits from our future. The feasibility of a time machine can only be assessed once we develop a predictive theory of quantum gravity. So far, we can only say that no Jewish scientist was able to use a time machine in our future to travel back in time and prevent the holocaust by killing Adolf Hitler. I would have certainly entered such a machine, because 65 members of my father’s family were killed in Nazi concentration camps. They were naïve enough to believe that German patriotism would save them from the Nazi gas chambers. My grandfather, Albert Loeb — after whom I am named, was wise enough to leave Germany in 1936. He did not count on a time machine to correct the political miscalculation of his family members.
(Image credit: Greg Wyatt)The most likely interpretation of UFO videos, to be released by the White House shortly, is that they reflect natural or human-made objects that were misidentified by the Pentagon or intelligence agencies out of confusion, by associating independent objects as a single fast-moving object, or being misguided by optical illusions or incorrect assessments of distances to objects or motion of the camera. Nevertheless, if the data is good enough it could potentially flag outliers outside the performance envelope of human-made technologies — in which case these might be products of extraterrestrial technological civilizations. Such objects would be a matter of planetary defense rather than national security, because all nations are passengers in the same boat.
As soon as the UFO videos, never-seen-before by the public, will be released on the website aliens.gov, I plan to analyze them with the research team of the Galileo Project and share our preliminary assessments with the public.
The question of whether non-human-made technological objects are lurking in the sky is not a matter of opinion or belief. It should be answered by scientific data analysis. And if the existing data is not good enough, we should collect more data with better sensors. This is the goal of the Galileo Project under my leadership. We do not need to rely on the government telling us what lies in the sky. Instead, we look up and figure it out ourselves.
(Image credit: Greg Wyatt)***
Below is the transcript of a related interview that I had this morning with the anchors Marc Lotter (ML) and Sharla McBride (SM) on “Wake Up America.” The video version of this interview is accessible here.
(Image credit: Newsmax)ML: Welcome back to Wake Up America. So, if you haven’t had enough space talk after NASA’s Artemis II moon mission, President Trump is now promising to break open the vaults when it comes to UFOs; take a listen:
“This process is well underway and we found many very interesting documents, I must say. And the first releases will begin very, very soon. So, you can go out and see if the phenomena are correct. You’ll figure it out. Let me know.”
So as lawmakers demand the release of America’s UFO files, the president’s announcement leaves many Americans, including me, once again questioning the government’s knowledge of potential alien life. And joining us now to break it all down, astrophysicist, Harvard University professor, Dr. Avi Loeb.
So good morning, Professor. President Trump ordered the Pentagon to begin reviewing these files related to aliens and UAPs back in February. What are you thinking? Are we actually going to see anything that we don’t already know?
AL: On Friday, I had the fortune of a visit by Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna to my office. We spoke for about 90 minutes, and it definitely looks like there are objects that either the intelligence agencies or the Pentagon cannot figure out, and that’s what makes life interesting.
The Trump administration rejuvenated space exploration with the Artemis II success recently. They’re also pursuing the new age of artificial intelligence. But I’m most interested in whether we have neighbors, whether there is alien intelligence, because that could transform the future of humanity.
Obviously, the government has a lot of data, which in part will be declassified and released, while other data will stay hidden from view because it relates to classified sensors or touches on national security. So, we will not see everything. The question is whether we will see some interesting data coming out in the first release on aliens.gov — the website that is currently expected to be the one where all the data will be deposited.
SM: I like that you are referring to them as neighbors. That’s nice. That’s a nice way to look at things. So, when UFO sightings have been reported in this country in the past, the military has been quick to kind of swoop in and ensure that there are no national security threats. And since the government has mostly kept what they found from secret sightings secret, how much do you think will still be redacted when these files are released?
AL: I expect only parts that relate to national security to be redacted or not released at all. But the disclosed data is really something that all of us should have a look at, especially scientists like myself. I am leading the Galileo Project, where we are looking up. We don’t just wait for the government to tell us what is out there in the sky, because we can build telescopes and observe it. And we are analyzing our data with machine learning or artificial intelligence. I just told my research team yesterday that once the data is released on the new government website, we must immediately examine it and assess what it implies. It may well be related to mundane phenomena or to human-made technologies. So, we have to look at it.
It’s all about the data. It’s not a matter of belief or conviction or opinion. It’s all about looking at the data and seeing what it means. And very often you don’t know the distance of objects or two objects may appear as the same object, so you can’t tell how fast they are moving. In the Galileo project, we use triangulation to figure out distances, accelerations, velocities, and we are still searching for something that is not human-made. Anything human-made is boring as far as I’m concerned.
ML: So, Professor, here’s my problem, and trust me, I believe that we are not alone, or space would be an awful waste of space, but I can prove one thing: the government in Washington leaks like the Titanic, and if they have had information, I have to believe someone would have leaked it to the media in the last 70-plus years.
A: I agree with you. The most reasonable scenario that I can imagine is there are things that the government cannot figure out. The intelligence agencies and the Pentagon prefer to keep these things under wraps in order not to be embarrassed that they’re not doing their job. Also, some of this data relates to classified censors, so they would not release it in order for adversarial nations not to be aware of our capabilities.
The way I see it, is that there is something that they do not understand. And I am here to help them figure it out. At the very least, it will help national security. We will feel safer. Remember the Chinese spy balloon incident where it took a while before it was spotted and eventually shot down. At the very least, this would help the Pentagon and the Intelligence agencies to do their job. But if we find that we are not alone, that would be the biggest revelation ever made. And I think it will bring us to a better place.
ML: Well, let me tell you, having worked for decades in the government, there’s a lot they don’t understand. Dr. Avi Loeb, thank you very much. Appreciate the conversation.
***
In this essay, I featured four amazing watercolors from a series created by the celebrated artist, Greg Wyatt. These watercolors incorporate inspiring statements by Ludwig Van Beethoven, John Milton and Walt Whitman. This is the 12th in a sequence of essays, where Greg and I collaborate on the interface between art and science. The first essay in this series, titled “Music of the Cosmic Spheres,” appeared here; the second essay, titled: “Cosmic Waterfalls in Spacetime Cliffs,” appeared here; the third titled “Missing Elements in the Cosmic Jigsaw Puzzle,” appeared here; the fourth essay, titled: “Why Do We Exist?”, appeared here, and the fifth titled “Inspiration from the Stars”, appeared here, the sixth titled: “We Might Understand How the Cosmos Works Before We Understand How Life Works”, appeared here, the seventh titled: “Will the Human Survive for Billions of Years”, appeared here, the eight titled: “The Butterfly Effect of Intelligence in the Cosmos”, appeared here, the ninth titled: “Benefits of Extraterrestrial Intelligence over AI”, appeared here, the tenth titled: “Übermenschen on Exoplanets” appeared here, and the eleventh titled: “If You Had an Infinite Research Budget, How Would You Allocate It?” appeared here.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.
Professional website:
https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/
Social media:
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb
https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb
View the full article
-
By Avi Loeb Medium
The symmetric system of three jets emanating from the nucleus of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS (separately from the primary anti-tail jet) after the circularly symmetric glow was removed by the Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter, based on a Hubble Space Telescope image taken on November 30, 2025. (Image credit: T. Scarmato and A. Loeb 2026)A new paper (accessible here) that I co-authored today with Toni Scarmato analyzed images of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope over the past five months. After removing the circularly-symmetric glow around the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS using the Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter, we identified three jets emanating from the nucleus that are equally separated from each other in sky projection by about 120 degrees in addition to a primary anti-tail jet pointed at the Sun.
Whether these jets are technological thrusters or pockets of ice that happened to be oriented symmetrically on the surface of a natural iceberg, the outflows of gas and dust in these three jets exerted thrusts through the rocket effect, which resulted in the observed non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS (as summarized in a paper that I co-authored with Valentin Thoss and Andi Burkert, accessible here). Our new paper links, for the first time, the directions and momentum flows in these three jets to the non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS.
In our previous paper (accessible here), we demonstrated that the jet system wobbles with a period of 7.2 hours, likely as a result the rotation of the nucleus. We concluded that the jet structure wobbles around the rotation axis with a characteristic angular excursion of about 20 degrees, and the rotation axis is aligned with the sunward direction to within about 20 degrees.
Building on this inferred jet system and periodic wobble analysis of 3I/ATLAS, our new paper measures the observed jet position angles and links them to the non-gravitational acceleration components in three dimensions. We use the sky projection and images of the three persistent jets to estimate the order-of-magnitude thrust that each of them provides to the nucleus. Altogether, our analysis provides consistency between the properties of the three jets and the inferred non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS, strengthening the evidence that the rocket effect explains the deviations of its trajectory from the path expected from gravity alone.
We adopted the observed jet position angles (PAs) in the sky (with North=0◦, East=90◦) on November 30, 2025 as follows:
• Jet1: PA = 65◦, • Jet2: PA = 290◦, • Jet3: PA = 175◦.
Our analysis identifies Jet2 as the dominant contributor to the transverse non-gravitational acceleration. The table below shows the breakdown of the contributions from the three jets to the non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS, a [with components (A1,A2,A3)], in meters per second squared:
The complete set of Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images is available here.
The symmetric configuration of three jets plus the anti-tail jet raises the question of whether they might constitute a technological system designed for stabilizing the trajectory of 3I/ATLAS. A recent paper by Bo Andree (accessible here) suggested that the
minimal approach for steering an interstellar comet along a controlled trajectory indeed matches this 3+1 jet configuration. By relaxing the full six-degree-of-freedom control to forward-cone steering — sufficient for practical navigation — the paper showed that four thrusters are required: one primary jet and three secondary jets separated symmetrically by 120 degrees from each other. The secondary 3-jets synthesize continuous in-plane steering, while the primary (anti-tail) jet provides low-bandwidth attitude shaping: as the body rotates, the primary-jet torque direction sweeps predictably over a cycle, enabling out-of-plane steering via phase-scheduled firing.
This highlights the fundamental question: is the observed 3+1 jet system around 3I/ATLAS a technological signature?
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, former director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (2005–2026), and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.
Professional website:
https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/
Social media:
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb
https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb
View the full article
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.