Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By NASA
      A chevron nozzle is installed on NASA’s Learjet for a mid-March 2001 flight test at Lorain Country Airport to verify that in an emergency, the aircraft could be flown using only the experimental engine. Credit: NASA/Marvin Smith
      Shortly after dawn on March 27, 2001, NASA pilot Bill Rieke took off from an airfield just outside of Phoenix in NASA’s blue-and-white Learjet 25 and flew low over a series of microphones for the first flight test of a groundbreaking NASA technology.
      On one of the plane’s engines was an experimental jagged-edged nozzle that researchers at Glenn Research Center in Cleveland had discovered made aircraft significantly quieter. These initial flight tests were an important step toward using these “chevron nozzles” on modern aircraft, lowering noise levels for communities.
      NASA Glenn has been exploring ways of reducing engine noise since the first jet airliners appeared in the 1950s. New turbofan engines in the 1960s were quieter, but the expansion of the overall airline industry meant that noise was still an issue. With the introduction of noise-limiting mandates in the 1970s, NASA and engine manufacturers embarked on a decades-long search for technologies to lower noise levels.
      NASA researchers discovered that the military’s use of rectangular notches, or tabs, along an engine nozzle’s exit – to help disguise a jet fighter’s infrared signature – could also reduce engine noise by helping mix the hot air from the engine core and the cooler air blowing through the engine fan. In the 1990s, Glenn researcher Dennis Huff and his colleagues discovered that a serrated, or sawtooth, shape, referred to as a chevron, offered more promise.
      Dennis Huff explains chevron nozzles, seen on a table, to U.S. Senator George Voinovich and other visitors inside the Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory facility in 2006. Huff was head of NASA Glenn Research Center’s Acoustics Branch at this point.Credit: NASA/Marvin Smith NASA contracted with General Electric and Pratt & Whitney to develop an array of tab and chevron designs to be analyzed in Glenn’s unique Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory (AAPL). Extensive testing in the spring of 1997 showed the possibilities for reducing noise with these types of nozzles.
      Engine manufacturers were impressed with the findings but wary of any technology that might impact performance. So, in 1998, NASA funded engine tests of the 14 most promising designs. The tests revealed the chevron nozzle had a negligible 0.25% reduction of thrust. It was a major development for jet noise research.
      In September 2000, Glenn’s Flight Operations Branch was contacted about the logistics of flight-testing chevron nozzles on the center’s Learjet 25 to verify the ground tests and improve computer modeling. Nothing further came of the request, however, until early the next year when Huff informed Rieke, chief of Flight Operations, that the researchers would like to conduct flight tests in late March—with just eight weeks to prepare. 
      Glenn’s Acoustics Branch worked with colleagues at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, and the Arizona-based engine manufacturer Honeywell on the effort. They planned to conduct testing at Estrella Sailport just outside of Phoenix from March 26 to 28, 2001.

      Bill Rieke and Ellen Tom with the chevron nozzle installed on the Learjet. NASA Glenn Research Center’s small Flight Operations team was heavily involved with icing research and solar cell calibration flights during this period, so arrangements were made for Tom, a Federal Aviation Administration pilot, to assist with the chevron flights. Credit: Courtesy of Bill Rieke With the required safety and design reviews, the eight-week target date would be difficult to meet for any test flight, but this one was particularly challenging as it involved modifications to the engine nacelle. While the special nozzle engineers created for the flights would allow them to switch between a six- and a 12-chevron design during testing, it also got hot quickly. This necessitated the installation of new sensors, rewiring of fire alarm cables, and the presence of an onboard test engineer to monitor the temperatures. The short turnaround also required expedited efforts to obtain flight plan approvals, verify the plane’s airworthiness, and perform normal maintenance activities.
      Despite the challenges, Rieke and a small team delivered the Learjet to Estrella on March 25, as planned. The next day was spent coordinating with the large Langley and Honeywell team and acquiring baseline noise data. The pilots idled the unmodified engine as the Learjet flew over three perpendicular rows of microphones at an altitude of 500 feet and speed of 230 miles per hour.

      View from below as NASA Glenn Research Center’s Learjet 25 passes overhead at the Estrella airfield with the experimental chevron nozzle visible on the left wing.Credit: Courtesy of Bill Rieke The flight patterns were repeated over the next two days while alternately using the two variations of the chevron nozzle. The researchers anecdotally reported that there was no perceptible noise reduction as the aircraft approached, but significant reductions once it passed. Recordings supported these observations and showed that sideline noise was reduced, as well.
      The flights of the Learjet, which was powered by a variation of GE’s J-85 turbojet, were complemented by Honeywell’s turbofan-powered Falcon 20 aircraft. These flights ultimately confirmed the noise reduction found in earlier AAPL tests.
      Overall, the flight tests were so successful that just over a year later the FAA began certifying GE’s CF34–8, the first commercial aircraft engine to incorporate chevron technology. The engine was first flown on a Bombardier CRJ900 in 2003. Continued studies by both NASA and industry led to the improved designs and the incorporation of chevrons into larger engines, such as GE’s GEnx.
      According to Huff, the chevron’s three-decibel noise decrease was analogous to the difference between running two lawnmowers and one. Their comparatively easy integration into engine design and minimal effect on thrust made the chevron a breakthrough in noise-reduction technology. In 2002, NASA presented an innovation award to the Glenn, Langley, and Honeywell team that carried out the flights. Today, airliners such as the 737 MAX and 787 Dreamliner use chevron nozzles to lower noise levels for communities near airports.
      Explore More
      3 min read NASA Selects Three University Teams to Participate in Flight Research 
      Article 6 hours ago 2 min read NASA Marks 110 Years Since Founding of Predecessor Organization
      Article 1 week ago 3 min read NASA’s X-59 Completes Electromagnetic Testing
      Article 2 weeks ago View the full article
    • By European Space Agency
      Marking another step towards new insights into Earth’s forests and their role in the carbon cycle, ESA’s groundbreaking Biomass satellite has arrived at Europe's Spaceport in French Guiana, to be prepared for liftoff on a Vega-C rocket at the end of April.
      View the full article
    • By European Space Agency
      At MWC25 Barcelona, the European Space Agency (ESA) unveiled a funding initiative, promoted in partnership with GSMA Foundry, to support projects aimed at integrating satellite and terrestrial networks for seamless connectivity.
      View the full article
    • By NASA
      1 min read
      Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)
      NASA GRX-810 Licensing Team, GRC

      * Denotes Team Lead
      NASA Ames Research Center
      John Lawson
      NASA Glenn Research Center
      Steven M. Arnold
      Aaron B. Brister
      Robert W. Carter
      Robert H. Earp
      Timothy P. Gabb
      Christopher J. Giuffre
      Paul R. Gradl
      Jason M. Hanna
      Bryan J. Harder
      Amy B. Hiltabidel
      Dale A. Hopkins
      Christopher A. Kantzos
      Michael J. Kulis
      Geoffrey S. Minter
      Brian T. Newbacher
      Callista M. Puchmeyer
      Richard W. Rauser
      Harvey L. Schabes
      Timothy M. Smith*
      Aaron C. Thompson
      Mary F. Wadel
      Austin J. Whitt
      Laura G. Wilson
      NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center
      Paul Gradl
      HX5, LLC
      Christopher J. Giuffre
      Aaron C. Thompson
      Austin J. Whitt
      University of Toledo
      Richard W. Rauser
      2024 AA Award Honorees
      2024 AA Award Honorees PDF
      ARMD Associate Administrator Awards
      Facebook logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASAes @NASA@NASAaero@NASAes Instagram logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASAes Linkedin logo @NASA Keep Exploring Discover More Topics From NASA
      Missions
      Artemis
      Aeronautics STEM
      Explore NASA’s History
      Share
      Details
      Last Updated Mar 06, 2025 EditorLillian GipsonContactJim Bankejim.banke@nasa.gov Related Terms
      Associate Administrator Awards View the full article
    • By NASA
      1 min read
      Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)
      eVTOL Propulsion Team, GRC

      * Denotes Team Lead
      NASA Glenn Research Center
      Aaron D. Anderson
      Devin K. Boyle
      Jeffryes W. Chapman
      Peggy A. Cornell
      Timothy P. Dever
      Justin P. Elchert
      Henry B. Fain
      Xavier Collazo Fernandez
      Matthew G. Granger
      Jonathan M. Gutknecht
      Michael C. Halbig
      Patrick A. Hanlon
      Hashmatullah Hasseeb
      David Hausser
      Scott A. Hensley
      Keith R. Hunker
      Michael J. Hurrell
      Keith P. Johnson
      Greg L. Kimnach
      John M. Koudelka
      Timothy L. Krantz
      Brian P. Malone
      Sandi G. Miller
      Nuha S. Nawash
      Paul M. Nowak
      Joseph J. Pinakidis
      Meelad Ranaiefar
      Trey D. Rupp
      David J. Sadey
      Jonathan A. Salem
      Justin J. Scheidler
      Andrew D. Smith
      Mark A. Stevens
      Thomas F. Tallerico
      Linda M. Taylor
      Casey J. Theman
      Mark J. Valco*
      Joseph S. Wisniewski
      NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
      Zachary A. Cameron
      Amentum
      Francis R. Gaspare
      David J. Henrickson
      Ryan M. McManamon
      Alan J. Revilock
      Connecticut Reserve Technologies
      Eric H. Baker
      HX5 Sierra
      Nathan A. Baker
      John W. Gresh
      George E. Horning
      Sigurds L. Lauge
      Brett M. Norris
      Nicolas Umpierre
      Bill J. Vaccareillo
      John Veneziano
      NASA Financial Support Services
      Madeline Duncan
      Ohio Aerospace Institute
      Mrityunjay Singh
      Universities Space Research Association
      Paula J. Heimann
      2024 AA Award Honorees
      2024 AA Award Honorees PDF
      ARMD Associate Administrator Awards
      Facebook logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASAes @NASA@NASAaero@NASAes Instagram logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASAes Linkedin logo @NASA Keep Exploring Discover More Topics From NASA
      Missions
      Artemis
      Aeronautics STEM
      Explore NASA’s History
      Share
      Details
      Last Updated Mar 06, 2025 EditorLillian GipsonContactJim Bankejim.banke@nasa.gov Related Terms
      Associate Administrator Awards View the full article
  • Check out these Videos

×
×
  • Create New...